While there are no dues or fees for membership at El Camino
Central, we do rely upon member contributions to keep the site and server running smoothly. As membership grows, so does
site usage. Recently we have seen a huge jump in server load and bandwidth. As a result, at times we notice extremely
slow page loading. Many of you may have also noticed the new member rankings used to recognize supporting members.
Become a supporting member today and get your own cool rank!
Every little bit helps.
Show your support by making a
donation here:
Supporters
page
Necoa #: 2321
Location: 15(AZ,NM)
Joined: Jan 30, 2004
Posts: 1169
Year: 1974
Model: El Camino
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:59 am Post subject:
Well like I said, it "might" make it run cooler but I didn't elaborate on that. It's possible that you could pull a bit of timing out of it thus cooling down the combustion chamber and transfer less heat through the block to the coolant. Even to me that's a stretch but I've seen weirder things happen.
Thing is if a cooler, denser air charge had no effect on carbureted vehicles there wouldn't have been so many models from multiple manufacturers offering it on their carbureted models. It's far cheaper to stick on a fake scoop than to engineer a functional one.
Let's not forget about all those pro-stock guys with 1200CFM carbs running in the NHRA. They don't allow Fuel Injection yet unless something has changed in the rules in the past year. A big scoop over an equally big carb is effectively ram air.
The whole idea is to cool the air charge down as much as you can before it gets to the combustion chamber. Yes it will pick up heat along the way but it will still be far more dense than the equivalent non-ram air setup.
Superchargers are in effect ram air pumps and they make whole kits that actually encase the carb to better control air flow. Turbo chargers work better with bigger intercoolers because they provide a denser, cooler air charge as well.
All this means nothing on an engine that can't take advantage of the effect though. As I mentioned in my earlier post, most of the factory setups had different carb setups and in some cases different cam profiles.
Of course I'm old enough to have actually seen these cars in action before they got to be collectors items. Not that I was old enough to own one or even drive one though
As for fun in a 229, I never had much fun with it. Might have been nice in a van or something. Even after the hopped up rebuild it still wasn't as good as a 350.
_________________ 74 El Camino Classic - project car #1
96 Camaro - RIP, Traded 10-16-2007
2008 Mustang GT, It ain't a Chevy but at least it's American!
I don't doubt you are right Snaggle. And I appreciate you taking the time to explain it. You make perfect sense to me. I also appreciate MHamilton explaining about what the heat stove does and what no having one would cause. I guess I had an idea what it did but not what the effect of not using it would do.
Thanks to all for your input. _________________ I didn't touch it. I swear.
There is no replacement for displacement! _________________ 84 Elky with 455 Buick, Tremec TKO600 5 speed, 8.5 3:42 posi -
My Members Page Album
Another 3 to 9 years should finish it.
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2
Page 2 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum