While there are no dues or fees for membership at El Camino
Central, we do rely upon member contributions to keep the site and server running smoothly. As membership grows, so does
site usage. Recently we have seen a huge jump in server load and bandwidth. As a result, at times we notice extremely
slow page loading. Many of you may have also noticed the new member rankings used to recognize supporting members.
Become a supporting member today and get your own cool rank!
Every little bit helps.
Show your support by making a
donation here:
Supporters
page
Necoa #: 364
Location: 9(IN,KY,MI)
Joined: Jan 09, 2003
Posts: 1274
Year: 1978
Model: El Camino
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 9:25 pm Post subject:
I think the difference in the two springs is more weight rating than ride hieght. Look at the side view of my '78, I have wagon springs on the rear, it sits level all around. _________________ 1978 El Camino Conquista/SS, F-41 suspension, 350/T5/3:73
(More pics on pg 6 of 5th gen members rides)
Necoa #: 14
Location: 5(NC,SC)
Joined: Dec 07, 2001
Posts: 1761
Year: 1978
Model: El Camino
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject:
It will lower you about an inch. The wagon springs have a extra coil over the camino stock spring. I took a pair of wagon springs off of mine cause I wanted it to set lower. _________________ 78 Camino SS, 355,built 700r4,3.23
Gallery78 Camino SS, 355,700r4,3.23
MSGT 145 AW
NECOA #14
wagon springs are an inch to an inch and a half taller. I put a set of them on my elky. _________________ El Camino Central Founder/AdministratorAuto A/C & Electrical Shop Owner, ASE Master
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum